At GCSE there are a lot of topics that the examiners love, and one of them are the controversial issues, should GM crops be grown in Britian, etc. In this blog I will investigate the issues of intensive farming methods; should they be done or are they damaging for the environment and the life in that environment?FertilisersFertilisers are chemicals used by farmers to aid plant growth.So why are they so great? Well first they increase the yield of crop, a higher number of crops grow to a good enough standard. This means the farmer gets more money, and the crop will cost less in the shops. They were also responsible for the Green Revolution during the 1940s all the way up to the 1970s, this was when the amount of crop yield grew hugely. Fertilisers also ensure a healthy plant, so more plants in a field are suitable for sale.But what's the problem with them? The main problem with them is that they cause eutrophication. Fertilisers that have been used can be washed off, or leached, off the land and can be washed into rivers. This causes the plants and algae to bloom and grow. The algae to grow so much that the surface of a lake gets covered, blocking the sunlight to the rest of the lake. The lack of sunlight results in the death to plants. Eventually, the huge amounts of algae will die, and lots of bacteria will start to decompose the dead plants and algae. These bacteria will need energy, so they will carry out respiration, which will use up the oxygen from the lake. This is a problem for fishes and other underwater animals; they don't have enough oxygen for themselves. They will eventually die.
Fertilisers- Increases yield of plants and ensure good plant health, but can cause eutrophication.
Pesticides
These are chemicals that are poisonous to pests such as weeds and insects.
Why do farmers use poisons on their plants? Insecticide and herbicide (chemicals used to repel insects and kill weeds) are very useful tools for farmers. Insects and other pests eat or compete with the crops that the farmer is trying to grow (there is a competition between the crop and weed for nutrience, sunlight, space and water) so less insects and weeds are what farmers want. Pesticides don't directly increase yield like fertilisers, but they get rid of the competition or the predators that eat the plant which then results in more plants being available for sale.
Why do people object to them so much? The main problem is bioaccumilation. If an apple is sprayed with insecticide, a worm may come along and start to nibble on the apple. Some of the insecticide will be in this worm. A hedgehog may come along and eat this worm that has nibbled on that apple, the concentration of insecticide increases in the hedgehog. Then an eagle swoops in and eats this hedgehog, and the level of insecticide increases again. But at this point this concentration is far too high and this kills the eagle. So bioaccumilation is the build up of chemicals up a food chain. Pesticides can also get leached as shown here:
Pesticides- they get rid of annoying insects and weeds, but they cause bioaccumilation which causes harm or death to top predators (that includes humans too!)
Biological control
Biological control is probably one of the most natural methods of intensive farming, this involves introducing a disease or predator in an environment that will get rid of pests.
Isn't this method dangerous? The diseases or predators that are introduced into an ecosystem specifically effect the pest. Ladybugs are an example of a predator, they were introduced to control the number of aphids, who were the pests. This is almost like a natural, non-chemical version of pesticides; they control the numbers of the pests and also there are no chemicals building up a food chain.
So is this the solution? This method is effective, but there are some drawbacks. The actual predator that has been introduced can become a pest itself. There have been many examples where the predators have not eaten the pest, and they have started to eat other things. There has been many cases where the introduced predator has out-competed the native species of the area. The problem with this method is that it is very difficult to control.
Biological control- controls the number of pests with nothing building up food chains, but extremely hard to control.
Battery Farming
Battery Farming is the method that tries to reduce the amount of energy lost from animals.
Why is this done? When ever an animal eats food, the energy from the food is lost through various ways, three of them being from heat, movement and excretion.
Out of the 100kJ of food eaten, only 4kJ is stored in the body
Animals are kept in small places where movement is restricted so less energy is used, the temperature is also kept constant so the body of the animal doesn't need to adjust when there are changing temperatures. As a higher proportion of the food is retained and isn't wasted, there is more meat and fat on the animal, increasing the quality. Antibiotics are also injected into the animals or is mixed in with the food, this reduces the chances of a disease spreading between the animals.
What's the problem with it then? Well, it's just cruel. Animals are caged up with other animals in a small area, the quality of life is very poor. Also the antibiotics can cause bioaccumilation and can build up to dangerous levels when eaten by humans. Bacteria can mutate because of the over exposure to the antibiotics, which means a disease can mutate, infect and animal and spread within days.
Battery farming- the quality of meat may be better, but the quality of life of the animals is very poor. There is also a very high chance of illness of build up of antibiotics